Rome Convention

Article 5

Certain consumer contracts

1. This Article applies to a contract the object of which is the supply of goods or services to a person ('the consumer') for a purpose which can be regarded as being outside his trade or profession, or a contract for the provision of credit for that object.

2. Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 3, a choice of law made by the parties shall not have the result of depriving the consumer of the protection afforded to him by the mandatory rules of the law of the country in which he has his habitual residence:

- if in that country the conclusion of the contract was preceded by a specific invitation addressed to him or by advertising, and he had taken in that country all the steps necessary on his part for the conclusion of the contract, or

- if the other party or his agent received the consumer's order in that country, or

- if the contract is for the sale of goods and the consumer travelled from that country to another country and there gave his order, provided that the consumer's journey was arranged by the seller for the purpose of inducing the consumer to buy.

3. Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 4, a contract to which this Article applies shall, in the absence of choice in accordance with Article 3, be governed by the law of the country in which the consumer has his habitual residence if it is entered into in the circumstances described in paragraph 2 of this Article.

4. This Article shall not apply to:

5. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 4, this Article shall apply to a contract which, for an inclusive price, provides for a combination of travel and accommodation.

Holdings

/
C-272/183 Oct 2019

Verein für Konsumenteninformation v TVP Treuhand- und Verwaltungsgesellschaft für Publikumsfonds mbH & Co KG

A trust agreement under which services owed to a consumer are provided, at a distance from another country, in the country of the consumer's habitual residence does not fall within the exclusion in Article 5(4)(b) of the Rome Convention and Article 6(4)(a) of Regulation No 593/2008.

C-272/183 Oct 2019

Verein für Konsumenteninformation v TVP Treuhand- und Verwaltungsgesellschaft für Publikumsfonds mbH & Co KG

A non-negotiated choice-of-law term in a trust agreement between a professional and a consumer for the management of shares in a limited partnership, selecting the law of the Member State of the partnership's seat, is unfair where it gives the consumer the impression that only that law applies and does not inform the consumer that, under Article 5(2) of the Rome Convention and Article 6(2) of Regulation No 593/2008, the consumer also enjoys the protection of the mandatory provisions of the national law that would apply without that term.